海角社区官网

But that鈥檚 how adoption curves work: New technology wins converts slowly at first, then all at once.

The digital technology that swept our lives into this millennium changed the way we communicate and shop, plan trips and watch shows. But it also came with a heavy cost to the planet. The greenhouse gases produced by online video streaming exceed one per cent of global emissions. Bitcoin miners produce more carbon emissions than some entire countries.

The next wave of technological upgrades to our lives, however, will emit zero carbon. It鈥檚 going to change how we get around, the way we heat and cool our homes and what we use to cook and take showers.

The electric vehicle (EV), heat pump, induction stove and heat-pump water heater may not alter our behaviour as much as texting and email have. But they will revolutionize society, allowing us to continue to do many daily activities 鈥� only faster, more efficiently and without producing emissions.

And they are poised to go from curiosity to ubiquity faster than you think.

The carbon-saving potential is enormous. According to an analysis by Corporate Knights鈥� research division and shared with the Star, these four technologies alone would cut the average Canadian household鈥檚 carbon footprint by 80 per cent. If everyone made the switch, it would eliminate 92 megatonnes from Canada鈥檚 national emissions annually 鈥� more than produced by all of the country鈥檚 oilsands.

The financial benefit is even greater. If everyone in Canada swapped out their existing gas-powered car, furnace, stove and water heater for these green technologies, the collective yearly savings would be more than $65 billion, the analysis found 鈥� $4,300 per household.

These ecological and economic incentives have created the conditions for rapid adoption, motivating governments that have emission-reduction targets to meet, as well as individuals feeling the squeeze of fossil-fuel-driven inflation.

Critics say fear of climate change will not prompt people to adopt new technology. They argue that we just love our gas stoves and gas-guzzling SUVs too much. But dozens of car dealers and HVAC professionals who spoke with the Star said EVs and heat pumps are popular not because they鈥檙e green 鈥� people are buying them for other reasons: convenience, comfort and savings.

The result is a win-win. People鈥檚 lives get better. They save money. And the faster these technologies are adopted, the fewer emissions Canada will produce.

The Star has partnered with Corporate Knights to analyze the benefits of these clean technologies, quantifying just how much cash Canadians in each province can save by adopting them, and what their impact will be on emissions.

The results vary widely across the country.

In Quebec, Manitoba and British Columbia, where hydro dams provide cheap, carbon-free electricity, the benefit of ditching fossil fuels is the greatest. An average British Columbian household switching to these four technologies would save more than $4,800 per year and virtually eliminate their carbon footprint (more than 97 per cent reduction).

In provinces with carbon-intensive electricity, such as Alberta and Nova Scotia, switching off fossil fuels has a smaller impact 鈥� and can even make your emissions rise in some cases 鈥� but the financial benefits are not insignificant. An average Nova Scotian household adopting the four green technologies would save $5,200 per year and shrink their emissions by five tonnes (or 64 per cent).

Switching now is also future-proofed. As the carbon tax rises, the cost savings grow 鈥� reaching an additional $790 per year on average for every household in 2030. And as the electrical grids in these provinces decarbonize, the already low emissions will piggy back them right down to zero.

We鈥檝e reached out to early adopters to find out about the benefits and challenges of these technologies, and have created calculators so you can figure out the estimated cost and emissions savings associated with each technology depending on where you live.

While no one would say these four pieces of green technology are a panacea for solving climate change, they鈥檙e a big start. And they鈥檙e something individuals can do without waiting for the government to act (though the incentives and rebates help).

Each EV, water heater, heat pump and induction stove on its own may not make a big difference for the warming planet, but they will save a family hundreds, if not thousands of dollars a year. And as Canadians switch away from burning fossil fuels and electrify their lives, the cumulative power of individual action is undeniable.

Electric vehicles (EVs)

David Hollingworth is an active skier, someone who heads up to Whistler from his home in North Vancouver for a day on the slopes whenever the powder is fresh.

But unlike many of his neighbours, he straps his skis to the top of his EV (a Nissan Leaf) for the trip into the mountains, and leaves his family鈥檚 gas-powered Honda CRV at home.

鈥淚t鈥檚 just a no-brainer, the cost savings,鈥� he said. While it costs more than $100 to gas up the CRV, Hollingworth estimates that an overnight charge for the Leaf runs him only about $2.

In the eight years since he bought his EV, Hollingworth says he鈥檚 grown more enamoured with it. The Leaf serves his family鈥檚 day-to-day needs so well they鈥檝e cancelled the insurance on the Honda except for a few months in the winter when they go on longer ski trips.

鈥淚 don鈥檛 keep a log of the expenses for both vehicles, but it鈥檚 just obvious. I鈥檓 sure that we鈥檝e saved thousands of dollars in fuel and maintenance (with the EV),鈥� he said. 鈥淓ven driving the CRV a lot less, it seems to cost us at least $1,000 in repairs every year. And the Nissan Leaf, it鈥檚 basically maintenance-free.鈥�

EV owners often cite fuel and maintenance savings as the top benefits. In B.C. 鈥� which has the highest gasoline prices in the country and some of the lowest electricity prices 鈥� those savings are $2,450 per year on average, according to the Corporate Knights鈥� analysis.

(The savings figure assumes charging at home using average electricity prices. Of course, many EV owners minimize their costs by charging overnight when electricity is cheaper and searching out free charging, still widely available.)

While EVs have a reputation for being expensive, this is changing quickly. Many of the early high-end models are now making way for entry-level EVs priced far lower than the average cost of a new car in Canada, which hit $58,478 at the end of last year.

A survey of 海角社区官网car dealerships last fall turned up four EV models with a listing price below $40,000 and nine more under $45,000.

These prices don鈥檛 include the $5,000 federal EV purchase subsidy, which is topped up by certain provinces, ranging from $2,500 in Newfoundland and Labrador to $7,000 in Quebec. (Ontario cancelled its EV purchase rebate in 2018 when Doug Ford鈥檚 Progressive Conservatives came into power.)

In B.C. and Quebec, the purchase subsidies are coupled with a sales mandate, requiring dealerships to have EVs available for purchase. (The federal government announced a nationwide sales mandate last December.) This combination has fuelled the fastest uptake of EVs in the country. Last year, EVs made up 16 per cent of all new-car sales in B.C. and 12 per cent in Quebec.

Ontario lags behind; only 6.5 per cent of new cars sold in the province in 2022 were EVs. Since automakers send their EVs to the provinces that have sales mandates, Ontarians have to wait for months or even years on Canada鈥檚 longest EV wait lists.

In addition to savings, EVs also boast souped-up climate impacts.

Even in provinces with electricity generated from fossil fuels, EVs dramatically reduce emissions because they鈥檙e so efficient. In an EV, up to 91 per cent of the energy in the battery goes directly to turning the wheels, while in a gas-powered car, 84 per cent of the energy from the gas tank is lost to heat and friction.

So in Alberta and Saskatchewan, where most electricity is generated by burning coal and natural gas, an average family would reduce their carbon emissions by 1.2 tonnes by switching to an EV, the Corporate Knights analysis found.

In Quebec, Manitoba and B.C., where most electricity comes from hydro dams, an EV would cut a family鈥檚 carbon emissions by far more: 3.1 tonnes per year.

Nationwide, if everyone switched to an EV, it would lower Canada鈥檚 carbon emissions by 57.8 megatonnes, or about 8.6 per cent of all emissions. This assumes we maintain our current electrical-generation sources. But if the federal government succeeds in getting our electrical grids to net-zero by 2035, EV adoption would reduce emissions by 67 megatonnes, or 10 per cent.

On each trip up to Whistler in his Leaf, Hollingworth has to make a 20-minute stop in Squamish for a quick charge. He uses the opportunity to stretch and admire the mountains 鈥� taking pleasure, he says, in knowing he鈥檚 doing his part to protect the beautiful scenery from climate change.

鈥淭here is some type of endorphin or dopamine that happens when you know you just saved a bunch of carbon emissions,鈥� he said.

He said he thinks everyone will soon be driving EVs, not only to reduce emissions, but because they鈥檙e so much cheaper and more convenient to operate.

鈥淲e鈥檙e in a transition period now. People will roll their eyes in the future when they look at how we lived today.鈥�

Heat pumps

Shortly after Brian Gifford retired and moved back to Halifax, he knew he had to do something about the oil furnace in his basement, which was costing him $2,500 to run each winter.

Not knowing that he had any choice but to continue to use oil, he added insulation to his basement, walls and attic 鈥� and saw his heating bills go down to $1,700.

Five years later, he was told his firebox had a crack and the furnace would have to be replaced, so he looked at switching to natural gas 鈥� newly available in the Maritimes 鈥� or buying an electric heat pump.

鈥淏oth environmentally and financially, heat pumps made a whole lot more sense,鈥� he said.

Installed in 2015, the heat pump has reduced his annual heating bill to $700 鈥� about a quarter of what it used to be.

鈥淭he heat pump is a huge, huge benefit, especially in places like the Maritimes, where heating costs are relatively high because we use oil,鈥� he said.

鈥淲e鈥檙e saving a lot of money,鈥� he said. 鈥淲e鈥檙e really happy with that.鈥�

For decades, heat pumps weren鈥檛 powerful enough to heat through Canadian winters. But the new generation of cold-climate heat pumps have been . They also do double-duty, running in reverse to provide air conditioning in the summer.

Much like the EV, the heat pump electrifies something that鈥檚 traditionally powered with fossil fuels. And like an EV, switching to a heat pump to heat your home saves money and reduces emissions 鈥� even on a dirty grid, like Nova Scotia鈥檚 鈥� because the technology is so much more efficient.

While the newest natural-gas furnaces operate at 98 per cent efficiency, heat pumps are 220 to 320 per cent efficient in Canadian conditions. This means that in a furnace, one unit of energy in natural gas produces 0.98 units of heat in your home. But with a heat pump, one unit of energy in electricity produces 2.2 to 3.2 units of heat. (This works because heat pumps use ambient heat in the air and concentrate it, gaining a multiplier effect on the energy used to power the process.)

As a result, heat pumps promise cost savings not only for people who switch from natural gas and oil furnaces, but for those switching from electric baseboards, because they will use far less electricity to produce the same amount of heat.

The Corporate Knights research division calculated that for a typical single-family detached house in Nova Scotia, switching from an oil furnace to a heat pump would save $1,750 in annual heating costs. They would save even more switching from baseboard heating: $2,773 per year.

The price to install a heat pump can vary from around $4,500 for a hybrid (one that works with your existing furnace) to upwards of $20,000 for a top-of-the-line centrally ducted model. Federal government rebates of up to $5,000 and zero-interest loans of $40,000, both offered through Ottawa鈥檚 , can significantly reduce how much you pay out of pocket at the outset.

Greener Homes can even eliminate the cost: if you鈥檙e switching from oil to a heat pump, there鈥檚 a special federal program that will cover up to $10,000. Provincial rebates can also stack on top of the federal ones, offering and Nova Scotia, and up to $20,000 in Quebec, reducing upfront costs even further.

Since the federal subsidies were introduced in 2021, heat-pump adoption has shot up, surpassing sales of natural gas furnaces in Canada for the first time, according to wholesale shipment information tracked by the Heating, Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Institute of Canada.

Because of their efficiency, heat pumps use far less energy to heat than furnaces, but just how big their impact is on carbon emissions is mostly determined by how the electricity is generated. In Nova Scotia, where the majority of electricity comes from coal and oil, switching from an oil furnace to a heat pump will reduce a typical household鈥檚 emissions by 1.2 tonnes.

In provinces with lots of carbon-free renewable electricity, the greenhouse-gas reductions are even greater. In Ontario, for example, a household switching to a heat pump would reduce its emissions by 4.2 tonnes and save $489 a year at today鈥檚 gas prices 鈥� savings that will nearly double by 2030 as the carbon tax increases.

Canada-wide, if everyone switched to heat pumps, it would produce annual savings of $13.5 billion and an emission drop of 26.3 megatonnes, or four per cent of the nation鈥檚 total, the Corporate Knights analysis found.

For a peek at the future, look no further than Sweden, where heat pumps have almost entirely replaced oil for residential heat. Since 1990, the pumps have been responsible for chopping carbon emissions from heating by 95 per cent, according to Martin Forsen, the president of the European Heat Pump Association, who gave a recent presentation in Toronto.

The adoption of heat pumps has gone so well in his Scandinavian country that he sees their global dominance as an inevitability.

鈥淚 don鈥檛 think it鈥檚 a question of if. It鈥檚 just a question of when,鈥� Forsen said.

Heat-pump water heaters and induction stoves

Anya Barkan鈥檚 water heater was 15 years old and 鈥渁 piece of garbage鈥� when she called her rental company and asked for it to be replaced.

After some back-and-forth that left her frustrated, she decided to break free from the rental contract she had inherited when she bought her home and get a heat-pump water heater.

鈥淚t just made sense. We wanted to stop that monthly fee and get something that is much more energy-efficient and also not reliant on natural gas,鈥� she said.

Breaking the contract proved much harder than getting the water heater. But ever since, Barkan said she has been happy, and not only because she no longer pays the monthly rental fee.

鈥淵ou can make your house more efficient and lower your bills. But also it鈥檚 better for the environment in terms of fighting climate change,鈥� she said.

Water heaters don鈥檛 have a huge impact on gas bills on their own. But like gas stoves, they are often one of the few links to the natural gas system in a home. If swapping these two gas appliances for electric means being able to cut your gas line, it supercharges the savings because it eliminates the fixed monthly charge for natural gas, which comes to $325 a year in Ontario.

Because gas water heaters consume relatively little gas, the Corporate Knights research found that swapping one out for a heater that operates with a heat pump would save an Ontario family just $124 per year. For an induction stove, the annual savings in Ontario for switching from a gas stove is only five dollars. But if switching lets you cut your gas line, those combined savings jump to $439 a year.

And it鈥檚 not just economics. There are other reasons people are looking to get rid of their gas stoves. Worries about air quality in the home surfaced earlier this year after an official with the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission said the agency was considering banning new gas stoves amid research that links them to childhood asthma.

While the ensuing uproar prompted the head of the agency to walk back talk of a ban, the health hazards are real. Health Canada鈥檚 estimate that 25 per cent of houses with gas stoves exceed the exposure limit for nitrogen dioxide (NO2), one of the toxic compounds released when a gas stove is turned on, 鈥渇or brief periods of time after cooking鈥� 鈥� even with 鈥渕oderate ventilation.鈥�

Meanwhile, some professional chefs recommend switching to induction stoves for performance reasons alone, saying they鈥檙e faster to heat up, more responsive, not as hot to work over and easier to clean.

Soon, people moving into new houses and apartments could have no choice but to go without gas appliances. Dozens of cities across the United States, recently joined by Vancouver, have banned natural gas hookups in new developments. The state of New York just passed a similar ban and 海角社区官网and Montreal city councils are considering similar measures.

Even though they burn little gas, the climate impact of eliminating these gas-burning appliances isn鈥檛 negligible. Switching from a gas stove to induction will reduce an average Ontario household鈥檚 indoor emissions of greenhouse gasses by 370 kg. Swapping a gas water heater for a heat-pump version saves 640 kg.

If everyone in Canada made these changes, the collective impact would reduce emissions by 7.6 megatonnes, more than one per cent of all emissions in the country.

It鈥檚 what analysts refer to as the light bulb effect. When incandescent light bulbs were replaced by LEDs, the difference in electricity consumption was tiny for any one lamp or light fixture. But multiplied across households, apartment buildings, university campuses and sport stadiums, the cumulative impact was enormous.

That鈥檚 where we鈥檙e at right now with climate change. The solutions are all readily available. The wind turbines and solar panels that provide clean electricity are being adopted much faster than anyone predicted. Now it鈥檚 time to electrify and use that clean power to eliminate carbon emissions.

鈥淚t鈥檚 not just your individual action that will change the world,鈥� said Barkan. 鈥淲e need to go at it together.鈥�

Marco Chown Oved is a Toronto-based reporter covering climate change for the Star. Reach him via email: moved@thestar.ca

Ralph Torrie is Director of Research for Corporate Knights and one of the world鈥檚 leading energy analysts. He has been working in the area of sustainable energy futures since the late 1970s and his low carbon scenario analysis for Canada was the first such study in the world. He is the inventor of strategic planning software for local government climate mitigation that was used by hundreds of cities on five continents.

Corporate Knights is a Toronto-based sustainable economy magazine and research company, founded in 2002.